In today's Times-Picayune, columnist Jarvis DeBerry takes the USDA to task for coining a new euphemism, "food insecure," to describe hunger in the United States. I think he's referring to the USDA's report, Household Food Security in the United States, 2004.
What does "food insecure" mean? The USDA defines a "food insecure" household as one that, "some time
during the year, had difficulty providing enough food for all their members
due to a lack of resources." What does that mean in practical terms? Appendix A
of the report provides some answers. According to the USDA's survey,
the following percentages of all U.S. households experienced the
following condition sometime during 2004:
- Worried food would run out before (I/we) got money to buy more: 16.6%
- Food bought didn't last and (I/we) didn't have enough money to get more: 13.1%
- Couldn't afford to eat balanced meals: 11.6%
- Relied on few kinds of low-cost food to feed child(ren): 17.1%
- Couldn't feed child(ren) balanced meals: 9.8%
- Child(ren) were not eating enough: 4.6%
Overall, the USDA rates food insecurity for 2004 at 11.9%, or 13.5 million households.
Of that number, about one-third (3.9% of all households) "were food insecure to the
extent that one or more household members were hungry, at least some time
during the year, because they could not afford enough food." Food insecurity with hunger was 3.5% in 2003; if my math is right, that means that from 2003-2004, hunger in the United States increased by 8.75%.
So there you have it, citizens of the most powerful nation on Earth. Nearly 12% of your neighbors are unsure of having enough to eat, and nearly 4% actually go hungry sometime during the year. And from 2003 to 2004, the problem got worse instead of better.
__________
p.s. I think DeBerry was being a little to hard on the USDA. The purpose of the term "food insecure" is not, as DeBerry suggests, to make hunger go away through humbug, but to describe a large group of our fellow Americans who, though perhaps not "hungry," literally don't know where their next meal is coming from. Even if the people in the bread line are being fed, the bread line's very existence means we have a problem.
Recent Comments