« Unless you’re striving for comic effect, never use this word. | Main | The never ending debate over citational footnotes. »

04 February 2014

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d9ec69e201a3fcb4d73f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I cook everything from scratch.:

Comments

Brom

Well, on the bright side, when I'm reading a brief with a lot of obvious boilerplate (like, say, a page and a half on the standards for summary judgment), it makes my job a lot easier because that's a passage that I know I can skip.

Brom

I saw the original post, and I wasn't offended. Strong language can be useful in conveying strong feelings. The language was certainly informal - nothing anyone would want to use in briefwriting - but I don't think a blog has to live by the rules of formal writing. And you weren't likely to be responsible for corrupting anyone - I'd assume that most of your readers are lawyers, so we were all corrupted long ago.

That said, I can understand your decision to dial back the language. Your modified post makes the same points and it does so without running the risk of offending anyone (which seems to be very easy to do nowadays).

Either way, thanks for the advice.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.