« Legal Productivity’s top 10 legal-writing blogs | Main | On the care and feeding of your designated briefwriter »

01 March 2013


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are we afflicted by the Dunning-Kruger problem?:


Stephen R. Diamond

Bryan is spot on: the Dunning-Kruger effect, for sure. But attorneys add another layer to the usual uninsightfulness of the unskilled in that they are uncommonly arrogant.

The comments responding to Bryan's article are particularly revealing in their defensive denial. The most common excuse is that flawed writing is "good enough." The truth is that it isn't even ethical to prepare low-quality work, based on the opinion that it will "probably" suffice, even if that's what the client wants. That's the difference between being a mercenary and being a professional.

For an extended reply to the "good enough" argument, see my "Good enough" consumerism and the myth of imperfectibily. ( http://tinyurl.com/28mdpr7 )

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)