It seems that the photo featured on my last post was doctored. The original magazine editors included the necessary commas. Still, the difference between the original magazine cover and the doctored version shows the importance of those little commas.
« Punctuation can make all the difference. | Main | Joe Kimble’s latest book »
13 June 2012
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d9ec69e20163068af927970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Postscript to the prior post on punctuation:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Comments
- Brom on A little editing exercise
- Diane on One space, not two, after each sentence.
- William A. Myers on Ambiguous punctuation leads to loss of attorney’s fees (or is it attorneys’ fees?)
- Ray on For punctuation geeks, an interesting decision by the U.S. 2nd Circuit
- Ray on What is the possessive of “Blind Boys of Alabama”?
- Michael Orenstein on What is the possessive of “Blind Boys of Alabama”?
- Ray on My first Scribes board meeting
- Mark Adler on My first Scribes board meeting
- Mark E Wojcik on My first Scribes board meeting
- Ray Ward on My first Scribes board meeting
Legal-writing blogroll
- Adams on Contract Drafting
- Appellate Record by Kendall Gray
- Ariana R. Levinson's blog
- Bad Language
- Building Rapport
- Business Writing
- Daily Writing Tips
- David Krell, Esq.—The Writing Guy
- Disputed Issues
- Goodcopybadcopy
- Grammar Girl
- Language and Law.org
- LawProse Blog
- Legal Writing Prof Blog
- Legalwriting.net
- Manage Your Writing
- Mark Adler
- PDF for Lawyers
- Plain Language columns from Mich. Bar J.
- Sentence first
- SPOGG
- Style & Substance
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Typography for Lawyers
- Write to Done
- Writing Tools
- Writing, Clear and Simple
- You Don't Say
Appellate blogs
- An Appeal to Reason
- Appellate Strategist
- California Appellate Report
- California Blog of Appeal
- Fifth Circuit Blog
- Fifth Federal Circuit Daily Updates
- How Appealing
- Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog
- New York Appellate Law Blog
- North Carolina Appellate Blog
- North Carolina Appellate Practice Blog
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- One Court of Justice
- Reverse and Render
- SCOTUSblog
- Second Opinions
- Southern California Appellate News
- Split Circuits
- Supreme Court of Texas blog
- SW Virginia law blog
- Texas Appellate Watch
- Virginia Appellate News & Analysis
Networking etc.
- To send me an e-mail, click here.
Search this site
- Powered by Google
Subscribe to the (new) legal writer
Stats
- Site Meter (started 21 Jan. 2006)
Reminds me of the kerfuffle over the Oxford comma that erupted with "the strippers, JFK[,] and Stalin." http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2011/10/03/about-those-strippers/
Posted by: Taylorcyoung | 14 June 2012 at 07:13 AM