Pressed for time, a lawyer filed a 21-page brief, 17 pages of which were copied verbatim from a published article, without attribution. For this, he was publicly reprimanded by the Supreme Court of Iowa. The court found that the lawyer’s conduct violated a rule against “dishonesty, fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit.” (Hat tip to Legal Profession Blog.)
« Today’s most entertaining legal-writing blog post ... | Main | For Bridging the Gap participants and anyone else who’s interested »
15 October 2010
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d9ec69e20134883a176c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lawyer reprimanded for plagiarism:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Comments
- Brom on A little editing exercise
- Diane on One space, not two, after each sentence.
- William A. Myers on Ambiguous punctuation leads to loss of attorney’s fees (or is it attorneys’ fees?)
- Ray on For punctuation geeks, an interesting decision by the U.S. 2nd Circuit
- Ray on What is the possessive of “Blind Boys of Alabama”?
- Michael Orenstein on What is the possessive of “Blind Boys of Alabama”?
- Ray on My first Scribes board meeting
- Mark Adler on My first Scribes board meeting
- Mark E Wojcik on My first Scribes board meeting
- Ray Ward on My first Scribes board meeting
Legal-writing blogroll
- Adams on Contract Drafting
- Appellate Record by Kendall Gray
- Ariana R. Levinson's blog
- Bad Language
- Building Rapport
- Business Writing
- Daily Writing Tips
- David Krell, Esq.—The Writing Guy
- Disputed Issues
- Goodcopybadcopy
- Grammar Girl
- Language and Law.org
- LawProse Blog
- Legal Writing Prof Blog
- Legalwriting.net
- Manage Your Writing
- Mark Adler
- PDF for Lawyers
- Plain Language columns from Mich. Bar J.
- Sentence first
- SPOGG
- Style & Substance
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Typography for Lawyers
- Write to Done
- Writing Tools
- Writing, Clear and Simple
- You Don't Say
Appellate blogs
- An Appeal to Reason
- Appellate Strategist
- California Appellate Report
- California Blog of Appeal
- Fifth Circuit Blog
- Fifth Federal Circuit Daily Updates
- How Appealing
- Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog
- New York Appellate Law Blog
- North Carolina Appellate Blog
- North Carolina Appellate Practice Blog
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- One Court of Justice
- Reverse and Render
- SCOTUSblog
- Second Opinions
- Southern California Appellate News
- Split Circuits
- Supreme Court of Texas blog
- SW Virginia law blog
- Texas Appellate Watch
- Virginia Appellate News & Analysis
Networking etc.
- To send me an e-mail, click here.
Search this site
- Powered by Google
Subscribe to the (new) legal writer
Stats
- Site Meter (started 21 Jan. 2006)
I was startled by the part of the sanction requiring the attorney to complete a law school course in professionalism. Not even CLEs.
Posted by: Ruth Anne Robbins | 16 October 2010 at 11:48 PM