A: It removes the characters from the story. Which pretty much wrecks the story. Sometimes that’s your goal. Usually it isn’t. For a fuller explanation, visit Plot to Punctuation. (Hat tip to Jane Friedman, via Mark Allen.)
« Another reason for a fresh set of eyes | Main | ESL students learn how to swear »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d9ec69e20133f294c444970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Q: What’s so bad about the passive voice?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
The reliance on active voice makes sense in creative writing. In legal advocacy, though, the measured and informed use of passive voice offers a tool that should not be ignored. Sometimes you want to shift the focus away from the actor to the result. In some cases the actor is not specifically known. Other times using passive voice allows you to place the emphasis of the sentence where you want it to be to make your legal point. A legal argument riddled with passive voice is usually difficult and boring to read, but the form should not be categorically banned from legal writing either.
Posted by: Kristen | 27 July 2010 at 06:24 AM
Kristen, you’re right. Bryan Garner says to stick with the active voice—unless you have a good reason to use the passive voice. And among the good reasons he and other experts give for using passive voice are the two you identify.
Posted by: Ray | 27 July 2010 at 08:02 AM
In any style of writing one occasionally needs to use the passive voice, but the point is most of the time you don't. Not only is the active voice a much clearer way to write, it also prevents the writer becoming too pompous. There is something about writing in the passive that seems to encourage a certain kind of pomposity.
Posted by: Liz Tucker | 01 August 2010 at 08:34 AM
Ray--
Thanks for the link to my article! That one, oddly enough, has been one of my all-time most popular articles.
Certainly, as Kristen says, there are times when passive voice creates a desirable effect. Even in fiction. "Andre! The secret documents have been stolen!" It's perfect (especially in dialogue) when as Kristen points out, you don't know--or particularly care--who the agent of action was.
Bear in mind, my blog is about techniques for character development in fiction. I certainly make no claim on advising people how to write legal briefs, term papers, scientific articles, et cetera. (Although I do have a lawyer client who has me help him bring out the story elements in his briefs to create maximum impact. Storytelling is useful everywhere.)
Posted by: Jason Black | 05 August 2010 at 12:07 PM