« Wayne’s document-design cheat sheet | Main | Transparency can be beautiful »

22 July 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d9ec69e200e553b24d898833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cast of characters:

» "Cast of Characters" from Stark County Law Library Blog
Posted by Raymond Ward: “If you’re telling a story involving many players, how do you help the reader keep the [Read More]

Comments

redwise

I love this. Seems like Bryan Garner may have been influenced by the authoring judge.

Greg May

I usually avoid those "dreaded" parentheticals by using a shorthand designation so obvious that it can't be mistaken for anything else. Once you've given the full name of the company as "Backscratcher Industries, Inc.," the reader is going to know that when you subsequently refer to "Backscratcher," at least if you do so very soon after the initial reference, you're talking about the company . . .as long as you're not also using the generic word "backscratcher" to refer to . . . backscratchers.

Also, though it's not required by our briefing rules, the justices don't seem to mind a separately headed "parties" section near the beginning of the brief. I think that's preferable to a footnote, anyway.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.