You can never be too careful.
The past several days, I’ve been working on a U.S. Fifth Circuit brief. It’s a moderately sized brief: 45 pages of substance (double-spaced, 14-point typeface), about 9,650 words. Today was the filing deadline. I had read, re-read, and re-re-read this brief, so I thought it was in pretty good shape. But I decided yesterday evening to give it one more good proofreading. To prevent myself from skimming, I used a big fat ruler to make sure I read no more than one line at a time. What I found was embarrassing: a total of 71 things that needed to be fixed. Here’s the breakdown:
- Inconsistent form in record citations: 7
- Grammar errors: 1
- Verbiage: 8
- Missing record citations: 25
- Record-citation errors: 9
- Miscellaneous things needing to be fixed: 21
So I ironed out the glitches and, this morning, got the thing to photocopying. I got back a good-looking pile of briefs ready to be filed, and I did something I always do: I checked each copy individually, page by page. In years past, this ritual has caught some embarrassing errors before they left the office: things like missing pages and pages copied upside down. Today the photocopy people did an outstanding job. Copy after copy looked great. That is, until I got to the third-to-last copy — which was missing the back cover. That copy did not leave the office. (I should say that the photocopy folks’ batting average is way better than mine. I made 71 mistakes; they made only one.)
The photocopy glitch was no big deal, because I always order a couple of extra copies just in case. To file and serve this brief, I needed exactly 13 copies. I ordered 15. So after pulling the bad one out of the batch, I still had one copy to spare.
The Fifth Circuit also requires filing and service of an electronic copy of the brief, either on CD or floppy disk. I found out that our photocopy department can make attractive CD labels to stick on a CD. For filing and serving, I needed 4 CDs with pretty labels. I ordered 5. This morning, when I copied the brief to the CDs, I found that one of the CDs was bad. No problem; I tossed that one in the trash and still had enough for filing and serving.
The lessons I learned today:
- If you’ve read and re-read that brief so many times that you’re sick of it, it probably needs one more painstaking proofreading before it’s ready to file.
- Always order one or two more copies than you think you’ll need, so that if something goes wrong, you’ll still have enough copies.
Thanks for this post. This happens to me all the time, but I usually don't catch the errors until the day after my filing. It comforts me to see that I'm not alone.
Posted by: NJ | 24 January 2008 at 08:38 AM
Another good way to slow yourself down when proofreading is to read the brief out loud to yourself.
Michael Orenstein
Office of the (Illinois) State Appellate Defender
Posted by: Michael Orenstein | 24 January 2008 at 04:59 PM
Another tool is a text to speech program. The computer reads the text aloud, and you follow on a printed copy. I catch lots of errors, even after the brief has been reviewed several times.
Posted by: Bill Theis | 25 January 2008 at 03:02 PM
9650 words????!!?!? Mr. Garner says to shoot for no more than 50% of the maximum allowable by court rules. I hope some of your error correction involved trimming this thing.
Posted by: Vlad the Impaler | 06 February 2008 at 04:42 PM