How to write so judges will like you.
Footnote not enough to preserve an issue

The first principle of briefwriting

Here is a reminder of the importance of following court rules governing the form and content of briefs. Last Monday, Chief Judge Diane Wood of the U.S. Seventh Circuit issued a scathing order rejecting two appellees’ briefs—including one by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions—for failure to strictly comply with the court’s local rule governing the content of the brief’s jurisdictional statement. To read the order, follow this link.

There’s a lesson here for lawyers practicing in Louisiana’s courts of appeal. Since 2014, Uniform Rule 2-12.4(3) has required the appellant’s brief to include a detailed jurisdictional statement, stating both the legal and factual bases for the court of appeal’s jurisdiction. Under this rule, a proper jurisdictional statement must state the following things:

  • the constitutional and statutory basis for the court to exercise appellate jurisdiction
  • the dates of the judgment appealed from and the order of appeal to establish the appeal's timeliness
  • specific information establishing that the judgment appealed from is an appealable judgment, including (as applicable) the following:
    • an assertion that the appeal is from a final, appealable judgment, including a record citation to any trial-court order designating the judgment as final and reasons for the designation of finality
    • an assertion that the appeal is from an interlocutory judgment or order which is appealable as expressly provided by law (hint: cite the statute or code article making it appealable)
    • an assertion of information establishing the court of appeal's jurisdiction on some other basis

In my experience, the majority of briefs that cross my desk include jurisdiction statements that fail to comply with this rule. I have to conclude that the briefwriters have not read and perhaps are not even aware of this rule. They are probably using other briefs as models for their own briefs without questioning whether the “model¨ actually complies with the rules.

My advice: Never, ever trust a “model” brief. For guidance on the form and content of your brief, read the Uniform Rules and the court of appeal’s local rules. It’s that simple, folks.

__________

p.s.  Here is a PDF copy of the Judge Wood’s order.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)